Pages

Ads from Adbrite

Your Ad Here

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Love Jihad

This was a new term introduced sometime back by a priest who claimed that there was operation of some fundamentalists to convert non muslims into muslims and this was done by muslim men or muslim boys who trap non muslims into a love affair ...........

Sometime it is considered progressive when there is a marriage which is inter religious or inter racial or inter cultural or something in which it is not of the same classification so the above should not be crime and accusation as they claim it to be and be limited to just a inter religious marriage, i am writing here with the assumption that these love affair cross the hurdle of marriage and live peacefully.Then its just a progression from inter caste marriage to inter religion marriage by passage of time as people have become more matured.

I was of this opinion and that the fanatic priest was insane.The issue had settled and there was no more talk about love jihad for some time.But recently a professor's hand was amputated in public as he had made a sentimentally provoking extract in a question paper.Followed by which everyone attacked Popular front a political organisation in kerala which is a muslim outfit.In moovatupuzha there was a procession by christians in which women held placards which read free kerala from terror.

I felt the above to be a method of turning a community faceless by branding them all as terrorists or otherwise link them to ISI or Pakistan.

Forgive those nuns and sheep who held those placards as they are ignorant of what they are doing and they did it to express concern over Prof Thomas whose arm was amputated and they considered it ok to slander Prophet Mohammed and Almighty Allah as they have no value for them.But lets understand how secular and how tolerant our country men are to others.

The statement made by C.M Achuthananthan shocked me.Did he do that in excitement of some tell tale he heard from some narrow minded or fundamentalist.When a C.M talk he should watch out what he speaks and not just scream something as though in his sleep.I am puzzled how he could think that way or repeat if that was told to him.

I disliked Kunhalikutty the womaniser, and opposed to his suggestions and considered him to be a slight man who should be ignored but today's remark by achutananthan was such that i couldn't support him and oppose Kunhalikutty.

I wish to disclose this otherwise my opinions in this post may not be received well, I am a capitalist but a supporter of communist party and i have been instrumental in bringing up this party in a muslim league dominated area in kasaragod and i hated muslim league, kunhalikutty and its bunch of hypocrites and considered protected by communiste party than muslim league, but that shield of secularism by communist party was shattered by V.S Achuthananthan's statement.

I am yet to find a convincing case of  Love jihad.

3 comments:

Sidrah said...

*speechless*

Michelle said...

I am not following this very well, I think. Why do you say that the Christians were slandering Allah? Also, I am of the opinion that anyone who is bent on "converting people" will do it by any means necessary. The fundamental reason for any kind of mission (as in religious mission) is to educate. However, I feel as though often people don't see the results that they want (conformity) and go to more extreme measures until it's just stupid.

Even if men and boys were able to trap women into a love affair. The women would be trapped into loving the men. Which has nothing to do with being a true believer in a religion. How sad that a priest has no thought on the sanctity of marriage.

This whole thing seems sad. And very unnecessary.

Zanil Hyder said...

@ Michelle

I wouldn't like to say Christians were slandering Allah.There were people who were slandering Allah and they happened to be christians.

Its about putting the blame on who did it than accusing everyone.

Indeed the free speech advocacy by Mark,ceo of facebook is something i despise.Slandering someone is not free speech or that of cartooning them where they loose their dignity would not be acceptable especially after an objection is raised against it.

As you have mentioned Its sad that a priest is commenting in such a manner.

At large Islam is under attack, from danish cartoon to Apple bar to mosque at Ground zero where people feel the presence of a mosque would hurt the kin of 9/11 victims.

If you found my blogs worth searching for

Custom Search